Nutrient quality
The formula has a meaningful concept but incomplete or modest active dosing. Missing form detail or an unbalanced mineral load further limits quality.
| $ 24.84 | ||
Supplement City | $ 29.99 | |
Vitacost | $ 27.99 |
The sizeable amino-acid blend is the central feature, but its components and individual amounts are not disclosed. That prevents users from knowing whether key amino acids are present in useful proportions.
Vitamin D and a modest sodium amount add breadth, yet the formula lacks the electrolyte profile needed for demanding hydration. The separate branded composite is listed only by total weight, creating another layer of uncertainty.
Blue raspberry flavor may matter to preference, but no specific taste evidence is supplied. Buyers who want transparent, individually dosed workout ingredients should look for a more fully disclosed label.
The formula has a meaningful concept but incomplete or modest active dosing. Missing form detail or an unbalanced mineral load further limits quality.
One or more blends or zero-value entries prevent full active assessment. Complete inactive ingredients and full use directions are also not supplied.
The aggregate satisfaction signal is strong and the supplied volume is useful. No specific experience details are supplied to assess repeated complaints, tolerance, or purpose-related outcomes.
The formula provides some useful actives, but serving value is weak or uncertain. Hidden blends, incomplete dosing, or a mismatched mineral profile reduce competitiveness.
| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
Total Carbohydrates | 1 Gram(s) |
Vitamin D | 12.5 mcg |
Sodium | 170 mg |
Amino Acid Interfusion | 10 Gram(s) |
Efforsorb EnDura Composite | 2 Gram(s) |
The label does not identify the sodium source, which limits confidence in its quality. The listed sodium amount is too low for demanding exercise replenishment. Serving cost is favorable, though the formula is aimed mainly at amino acid supplementation rather than hydration.