Product Image

Nitro Tech Cookies And Cream

4.6
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
(5008 ratings)
Sodium 160 mg
Protein (unspecified) 30 Gram(s)
Whey Protein
Product Image
Score65
A practical choice for a high-protein powder when full blend transparency is not essential, but the label detail and electrolyte coverage leave clear trade-offs. It is not a substitute for a dedicated electrolyte mix after heavy sweating.
How scoring works
Powder
Quantity:3 lb(s) • (50 servings)
Goals:

Score 65

A practical choice for a high-protein powder when full blend transparency is not essential, but the label detail and electrolyte coverage leave clear trade-offs. It is not a substitute for a dedicated electrolyte mix after heavy sweating.
How scoring works
$65.51($1.31 per serving)
iHerb
$ 75.35
iHerb
$ 65.51
Report prices

Analysis

30 g of protein is a substantial serving while listed fat and carbohydrate remain low. The added blends may be relevant to the formula, but their zero or unspecified amounts prevent a useful assessment.

160 mg of sodium is too little for substantial sweat replacement. No supporting electrolyte system is listed, so the product fits protein nutrition better than hydration.

The Super Amino Strength Matrix and Enzyplex are named without useful amounts or ingredient detail. Value is acceptable, though lower-cost options may deliver similar protein.

Who is it for
  • A high-protein powder when full blend transparency is not essential
  • People adding protein to meals or snacks
  • People who prefer a measured powder serving
Best for
  • Daily protein intake
  • Low-fat protein shakes
  • Protein nutrition rather than electrolyte replacement

Pros

  • 30 g protein is a meaningful serving
  • 1.5 g fat and 1 g carbohydrate keep the macro profile focused
  • Nutrition amounts are clearly disclosed

Cons

  • Too little sodium for demanding sweat replacement
  • Named add-on blends lack usable dose detail
  • Value trails stronger options in the set

Warnings

  • Undisclosed blend ingredients and amounts make sensitivity and interaction screening incomplete.
  • The 160 mg sodium amount should not be relied on for heavy-sweat electrolyte replacement.
  • The named add-on blends lack usable dose detail, so their practical contribution cannot be judged.

Nutrient quality

77 High impact

The protein amount is substantial and the macronutrient profile is lean. Unknown protein forms and unquantified support matrices limit quality and dose assessment.

.

Ingredient transparency

46 Lower impact

Protein and basic nutrition amounts are clear. Unquantified matrices, missing protein sources, absent additives, and incomplete directions substantially reduce transparency.

.

Customer satisfaction

71 High impact

The supplied average rating is strong and supported by a large review pool. No review text is available to assess recurring complaints or firsthand taste, texture, or mixability.

.

Value for money

70 High impact

The high protein amount broadly justifies the moderate relative cost. A substantial protein amount supports good value, while opaque support matrices weaken quality-adjusted efficiency.

.
Report analysis

Ingredients

IngredientAmount per serving
Calories
140 {Calories}
Total Fat
1.5 Gram(s)
Cholesterol
30 mg
Total Carbohydrates
1 Gram(s)
Protein
30 Gram(s)
Calcium
100 mg
Sodium
160 mg
Super Amino Strength Matrix
0 NP
Enzyplex
0 NP
Adults 18–50
Report overview
Sodium · 160 mg OverallScore61
D Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityC+ Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyB+ Value

The sodium amount is too low for substantial sweat replacement, making it a weak electrolyte-focused choice. The sodium source is unspecified, and the listed non-electrolyte blends do not add mineral support. Its cost per serving is reasonable, but the limited sodium dose weakens its value for this use.

Loading alternative details
Report alternatives