Nutrient quality
The protein amount is meaningful and the macronutrient profile is lean. Missing whey-source and amino-acid details limit certainty about form quality.
.| $ 98.75 | ||
Vitacost | $ 84.99 | |
| $ 114.99 |
24 g of protein provides a useful amount for meals, snacks, or post-exercise nutrition. With 1.5 g of fat and 3 g of carbohydrate, the serving keeps most of its nutrition focused on protein.
130 mg of sodium is too little for substantial sweat replacement. No supporting electrolyte system is listed, so the product fits protein nutrition better than hydration.
The core nutrition facts are clear, but the protein forms and inactive ingredients are not supplied. Value appears competitive for a mainstream protein serving.
The protein amount is meaningful and the macronutrient profile is lean. Missing whey-source and amino-acid details limit certainty about form quality.
.Protein and basic nutrition amounts are clearly disclosed. The whey blend, flavoring system, additives, and complete use directions are not supplied.
.The supplied average rating is strong and supported by a very large review pool. No review text is available to assess recurring complaints or firsthand taste, texture, or mixability.
.The full, lean protein serving broadly justifies the relative cost. The low serving cost supports good value for a full protein amount.
.| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
Calories | 120 {Calories} |
Total Fat | 1.5 Gram(s) |
Cholesterol | 55 mg |
Sodium | 130 mg |
Total Carbohydrates | 3 Gram(s) |
Protein | 24 Gram(s) |
Vitamin A | 0 Not Present |
Calcium | 0 Not Present |
Vitamin C | 0 Not Present |
Iron | 0 Not Present |
The sodium amount is too low for substantial sweat replacement, making it a weak electrolyte-focused choice. The sodium source is unspecified, and no supporting electrolyte is present. Its cost per serving is reasonable, but the limited sodium dose weakens its value for this use.