Product Image

Select Protein Amazing Gourmet Vanilla

4.6
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
(123 ratings)
Sodium 230 mg
Calcium 280 mg
Protein 24 Gram(s)
Product Image
Score72
A 24 g protein serving with 280 mg calcium and a lean calorie profile fits routine protein supplementation. Protein sources and inactive ingredients are not identified in the supplied data.
How scoring works
Quantity:30 Ounce(s) • (27 servings)
Goals:

Score 72

A 24 g protein serving with 280 mg calcium and a lean calorie profile fits routine protein supplementation. Protein sources and inactive ingredients are not identified in the supplied data.
How scoring works
$54.99($2.03 per serving)
iHerb
$ 54.99
Report prices

Analysis

A 24 g protein serving with 280 mg calcium and a lean calorie profile fits routine protein supplementation. The powder offers useful macronutrient density for snacks or post-exercise use.

Protein sources and inactive ingredients are not identified in the supplied data. The high serving cost therefore comes without enough information to judge amino-acid quality, digestion, sweeteners, or allergens.

It fits users who want a lean flavored shake and accept limited disclosure. Value-focused or allergy-conscious shoppers should choose a product with complete source and ingredient details.

Who is it for
  • It fits users who want a lean flavored shake and accept limited disclosure
  • Value-focused or allergy-conscious shoppers should choose a product with complete source and ingredient details
Best for
  • Provides 24 g protein
  • Includes 280 mg calcium
  • Lean fat and carbohydrate profile

Pros

  • Provides 24 g protein
  • Includes 280 mg calcium
  • Lean fat and carbohydrate profile

Cons

  • Protein source is missing
  • Inactive ingredients are not shown
  • High serving cost

Warnings

  • Missing protein-source and inactive-ingredient details prevent reliable allergen screening.
  • The 230 mg sodium should be counted by users following a sodium-restricted plan.
  • Users with clinician-directed protein limits should account for the 24 g serving.

Nutrient quality

81 Highest impact

The protein amount is meaningful for general protein nutrition. Missing source detail and secondary nutrient forms limit quality assessment.

Ingredient transparency

77 High impact

Macronutrients and minerals have specific amounts without a hidden blend. Protein-source detail, inactive ingredients, and complete preparation directions remain incomplete.

Customer satisfaction

64 Moderate impact

The aggregate satisfaction signal is moderate and the supplied volume is modest. No specific experience details are supplied to assess repeated complaints, taste, texture, or purpose-related outcomes.

Value for money

63 Moderate impact

The core protein provides some value, but the serving is costly or poorly aligned with the stated use. Weak disclosure or an unbalanced formula further reduces competitiveness.

Report analysis

Ingredients

IngredientAmount per serving
Calories
120 Calorie(s)
Total Fat
1.5 Gram(s)
Cholesterol
45 mg
Sodium
230 mg
Total Carbohydrates
2.5 Gram(s)
Protein
24 Gram(s)
Vitamin D
0 mcg
Potassium
10 mg
Calcium
280 mg
Iron
0 mg
Gluten Free Adults 18–50 Women
Report overview
Sodium · 230 mg OverallScore63
D Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityB Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyB- Value

The sodium amount offers modest replenishment but remains below the preferred range for heavier sweat loss. Potassium is present only in a small amount, and its form and the sodium source are not disclosed. The protein formula adds broader value, though serving cost and uncertain sugar content limit its efficiency as an electrolyte option.

Calcium · 280 mg OverallScore49
F Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityB+ Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyF Value

An undisclosed calcium form prevents a meaningful absorption-quality assessment, while the 280 mg amount supports general supplementation but may not cover high needs alone. The elemental amount is clear, and no artificial color, sweetener, or whitening agent appears in the supplied ingredients. A very high serving cost makes it poor value for calcium.

Loading alternative details
Report alternatives