Product Image

Select Protein Chocolate Peanut Butter Cup

4.5
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
(1867 ratings)
Sodium 280 mg
Calcium 280 mg
Milk protein
Protein 23 Gram(s)
Whey Protein
Product Image
Score58
The protein amount is substantial and supports routine dietary protein intake. The listed potassium amount is implausible and requires current-label verification.
How scoring works
Powder
Quantity:31 Ounce(s) • (27 servings)
Goals:

Score 58

The protein amount is substantial and supports routine dietary protein intake. The listed potassium amount is implausible and requires current-label verification.
How scoring works
$54.99($2.03 per serving)
iHerb
$ 54.99
Amazon
$ 54.99
Report prices

Analysis

The protein amount is substantial and supports routine dietary protein intake. Calcium and a lean macronutrient profile provide additional utility.

The listed potassium amount is implausible and requires current-label verification. Missing protein sources and inactive ingredients create further uncertainty around quality and allergens.

It fits users only after the potassium figure is confirmed. Anyone unable to verify the label should choose a clearly documented protein powder.

Who is it for
  • It fits users only after the potassium figure is confirmed
  • Anyone unable to verify the label should choose a clearly documented protein powder
Best for
  • Substantial protein amount
  • Provides calcium
  • Lean routine-shake profile

Pros

  • Substantial protein amount
  • Provides calcium
  • Lean routine-shake profile

Cons

  • Potassium amount appears implausible
  • Protein sources are missing
  • Inactive ingredients are not disclosed

Warnings

  • Verify the potassium amount on the current label before use because the supplied figure is implausible.
  • Missing protein-source details prevent reliable allergen screening.
  • Users with kidney impairment or potassium-managing medication should not rely on an unverified potassium figure.

Nutrient quality

56 Moderate impact

The formula supplies meaningful protein but is poorly aligned with the stated goal. A very large mineral or carbohydrate entry further weakens suitability.

Ingredient transparency

69 High impact

Macronutrients and minerals have specific amounts without a hidden blend. Protein-source detail, inactive ingredients, and complete preparation directions remain incomplete.

Customer satisfaction

68 High impact

The aggregate satisfaction signal is moderate and the supplied volume is substantial. No specific experience details are supplied to assess repeated complaints, taste, texture, or purpose-related outcomes.

Value for money

37 Lower impact

The core protein provides some value, but the serving is costly or poorly aligned with the stated use. Weak disclosure or an unbalanced formula further reduces competitiveness.

Report analysis

Ingredients

IngredientAmount per serving
Calories
120 Calorie(s)
Total Fat
1 Gram(s)
Cholesterol
45 mg
Sodium
280 mg
Total Carbohydrates
4 Gram(s)
Protein
23 Gram(s)
Vitamin D
0 mcg
Potassium
23 Gram(s)
Calcium
280 mg
Iron
0 mg
Gluten Free Adults 18–50 Women
Report overview
Sodium · 280 mg OverallScore62
D- Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityB Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyB- Value

The sodium amount can support lighter sweat replacement but sits below the preferred athletic range. Potassium is listed at an implausibly high amount, making that supporting-electrolyte data unreliable, and the sodium source is not disclosed. Protein adds wider nutritional value, while carbohydrate and label uncertainty weaken its hydration fit.

Calcium · 280 mg OverallScore49
F Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityB+ Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyF Value

An undisclosed calcium form prevents a meaningful absorption-quality assessment, while the 280 mg amount supports general supplementation but may not cover high needs alone. The elemental amount is clear, and no artificial color, sweetener, or whitening agent appears in the supplied ingredients. A very high serving cost makes it poor value for calcium.

Loading alternative details
Report alternatives