Nutrient quality
The formula supplies meaningful protein but is poorly aligned with the stated goal. A very large mineral or carbohydrate entry further weakens suitability.
| $ 54.99 | ||
Amazon | $ 54.99 |
The protein amount is substantial and supports routine dietary protein intake. Calcium and a lean macronutrient profile provide additional utility.
The listed potassium amount is implausible and requires current-label verification. Missing protein sources and inactive ingredients create further uncertainty around quality and allergens.
It fits users only after the potassium figure is confirmed. Anyone unable to verify the label should choose a clearly documented protein powder.
The formula supplies meaningful protein but is poorly aligned with the stated goal. A very large mineral or carbohydrate entry further weakens suitability.
Macronutrients and minerals have specific amounts without a hidden blend. Protein-source detail, inactive ingredients, and complete preparation directions remain incomplete.
The aggregate satisfaction signal is moderate and the supplied volume is substantial. No specific experience details are supplied to assess repeated complaints, taste, texture, or purpose-related outcomes.
The core protein provides some value, but the serving is costly or poorly aligned with the stated use. Weak disclosure or an unbalanced formula further reduces competitiveness.
| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
Calories | 120 Calorie(s) |
Total Fat | 1 Gram(s) |
Cholesterol | 45 mg |
Sodium | 280 mg |
Total Carbohydrates | 4 Gram(s) |
Protein | 23 Gram(s) |
Vitamin D | 0 mcg |
Potassium | 23 Gram(s) |
Calcium | 280 mg |
Iron | 0 mg |
The sodium amount can support lighter sweat replacement but sits below the preferred athletic range. Potassium is listed at an implausibly high amount, making that supporting-electrolyte data unreliable, and the sodium source is not disclosed. Protein adds wider nutritional value, while carbohydrate and label uncertainty weaken its hydration fit.
An undisclosed calcium form prevents a meaningful absorption-quality assessment, while the 280 mg amount supports general supplementation but may not cover high needs alone. The elemental amount is clear, and no artificial color, sweetener, or whitening agent appears in the supplied ingredients. A very high serving cost makes it poor value for calcium.