Product Image

Glutathione-SR

Thorne
4.6
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
(3556 ratings)
Glutathione 175 mg
Product Image
Score78
175 mg of glutathione anchors a solid single-ingredient option with limited value. Its main trade-off is the moderately high dose, which may be either convenient or restrictive depending on the intended routine.
How scoring works
Quantity:60 Capsule(s) • (60 servings)
Goals:

Score 78

175 mg of glutathione anchors a solid single-ingredient option with limited value. Its main trade-off is the moderately high dose, which may be either convenient or restrictive depending on the intended routine.
How scoring works
$54.00($0.90 per serving)
iHerb
$ 54.00
Amazon
$ 54.00
Vitacost
$ 54.00
Vitacost
$ 54.03
Pure Formulas
$ 54.00
Report prices

Analysis

The 175 mg serving provides glutathione as the main active in capsule(s). The amount gives the product a moderately high-dose profile without adding unrelated actives.

The amount is stated, but the supplied information leaves some formulation detail unspecified. Value is a notable trade-off compared with more economical options, and the focused formula makes comparison with similar products easier.

The strongest practical fit is everyday coq10 supplementation, with related assessments also supporting glutathione-focused use. The main decision is whether 175 mg and the capsule(s) format match the user's preferred routine and budget.

Who is it for
  • Adults seeking a moderately high-dose Glutathione supplement
  • People who prefer capsule(s) for glutathione
  • Users focused on everyday coq10 supplementation
Best for
  • Routine CoQ10 use
  • moderately high dosing
  • glutathione preference

Pros

  • Clearly stated 175 mg amount
  • Focused glutathione formula
  • Serving amount is easy to identify
  • Simple format makes alternatives easy to compare

Cons

  • 175 mg may not match users seeking a lower or higher amount
  • Capsule(s) may not suit every user's format preference
  • Value is less competitive than stronger alternatives

Nutrient quality

86 Highest impact

Sustained release adds a useful delivery feature. An uncharacterized form and moderate amount limit confidence in exposure.

.

Ingredient transparency

82 Highest impact

Active amounts are clearly disclosed without a hidden blend. Complete directions and inactive ingredients remain absent.

.

Customer satisfaction

72 High impact

Customer sentiment is very strong. An exceptionally large rating base makes the average highly dependable, while no narrative feedback was supplied.

.

Value for money

66 High impact

Serving economics are weak. Quality limitations keep practical value low.

.
Report analysis

Ingredients

IngredientAmount per serving
Glutathione
175 mg
Gluten Free Adults 18–50
Report overview
Glutathione · 175 mg OverallScore53
D Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityC+ Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyF Value

Sustained-release delivery may reduce immediate breakdown, though the label does not identify a reduced form or a branded purity source. The clearly disclosed 175 mg dose is near the collection median and comes in one convenient capsule. Value is limited because the serving cost is high for the amount provided.

View ingredientView products
Loading alternative details
81 Performance

Liposomal Glutathione with Lemon Mint

Quicksilver Scientific
<p>Its label clearly provides 100 mg of Opitac Glutathione, making it a more clearly defined glutathione option. Compared with the original, its ingredient and goal alignment is stronger, although the input does not provide independent testing or absorption evidence.</p>
84 Performance

L-Glutathione Reduced 500 mg

Healthy Origins
<p>Its label clearly provides 500 mg of Setria as L-Glutathione, Reduced, making it a more clearly defined glutathione option. Compared with the original, its ingredient and goal alignment is stronger, although the input does not provide independent testing or absorption evidence.</p>
79 Performance

L-Glutathione 100 mg

Metabolic Maintenance
<p>Its label clearly provides 100 mg of Setria Glutathione, making it a more clearly defined glutathione option. Compared with the original, its ingredient and goal alignment is stronger, although the input does not provide independent testing or absorption evidence.</p>
83 Budget

High Potency L-Glutathione 200 mg

Swanson Ultra
<p>Its label clearly provides 200 mg of Setria Glutathione as L-Glutathione, preserving relevant glutathione coverage. Compared with the original, it lowers the serving cost, although the input does not provide independent testing or absorption evidence.</p>
82 Budget

Reduced L-Glutathione 250 mg

Solgar
<p>Its label clearly provides 250 mg of L-Glutathione, preserving relevant glutathione coverage. Compared with the original, it lowers the serving cost, although the input does not provide independent testing or absorption evidence.</p>
85 Budget

Glutathione 500 mg

NOW
<p>Its label clearly provides 500 mg of Glutathione, Reduced, preserving relevant glutathione coverage. Compared with the original, it lowers the serving cost, although the input does not provide independent testing or absorption evidence.</p>
83 Value

Glutathione Reduced 500 mg

Jarrow Formulas
<p>Its label clearly provides 500 mg of Glutathione, keeping the formula relevant to glutathione. Compared with the original, the lower serving cost and ingredient detail create a useful quality-to-cost balance, although the input does not provide independent testing or absorption evidence.</p>
82 Value

L-Glutathione 100 mg

Swanson
<p>Its label clearly provides 100 mg of Setria Glutathione as L-Glutathione, keeping the formula relevant to glutathione. Compared with the original, the lower serving cost and ingredient detail create a useful quality-to-cost balance, although the input does not provide independent testing or absorption evidence.</p>
77 Value

Supplemelts Sublingual L-Glutathione Natural Orange Flavor 50 mg

Swanson Ultra
<p>Its label clearly provides 50 mg of Setria Glutathione as L-Glutathione, keeping the formula relevant to glutathione. Compared with the original, the lower serving cost and ingredient detail create a useful quality-to-cost balance, although the input does not provide independent testing or absorption evidence.</p>
Report alternatives