Nutrient quality
Branded maritime pine and sourced rutin are informative, while acerola lacks botanical and potency detail. Rutin is meaningful, with moderate maritime pine and acerola amounts.
.| $ 27.97 | ||
Vitacost | $ 30.61 | |
Daily Vita | $ 28.90 | |
| $ 30.61 | ||
| $ 30.61 | ||
Amazon | $ 23.44 |
Pycnogenol supplies a branded maritime pine extract, while rutin has its Sophora japonica source identified. Both ingredients provide stronger characterization than generic antioxidant powders.
Acerola powder adds a moderate amount but lacks species, fruit-part, concentration, and vitamin C yield details. It is a supporting ingredient rather than the strongest reason to choose the formula.
A one-capsule serving and moderate count are practical. The combination best fits users seeking pine bark and rutin together, with acerola as a secondary addition.
Branded maritime pine and sourced rutin are informative, while acerola lacks botanical and potency detail. Rutin is meaningful, with moderate maritime pine and acerola amounts.
.Active amounts are stated and no proprietary blend hides a core dose. Missing excipient details and complete use directions leave the supplied label information incomplete.
.The supplied aggregate satisfaction average provides a broad signal, while the response volume determines how stable it appears. No comment-level evidence is available to assess repeated complaints or confirm intended-use experiences.
.The formula offers mixed but reasonable serving value. Each listed active has a plausible role, though acerola is less clearly characterized.
.| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
Pycnogenol | 60 mg |
Acerola powder | 200 mg |
Rutin powder (Sophora japonica) | 240 mg |
The label clearly identifies Sophora japonica as the rutin source, improving source confidence. The powder lacks purity detail, but its moderate dose approaches a more targeted level. Cost per active amount remains good despite a higher serving cost.
Acerola powder supplies a moderate dose but lacks extract concentration or vitamin C standardization. The plant part and botanical species are also missing from the label. Its cost per amount of acerola is high, and the formula is primarily positioned around other actives.