Nutrient quality
The protein amount is meaningful for general protein nutrition. Missing source detail and secondary nutrient forms limit quality assessment.
| $ 75.35 | ||
Vitacost | $ 79.05 | |
Vitacost | $ 79.05 |
A substantial protein serving and meaningful calcium support muscle nutrition and general dietary intake. The larger tub provides a convenient supply for frequent shakes.
Two zero-quantity marketing matrices provide no usable dose information. The protein source and full non-active ingredient list are also incompletely described relative to the serving cost.
It fits users who mainly want a familiar flavored protein powder. Transparent protein products offer easier quality and allergen assessment at this price level.
The protein amount is meaningful for general protein nutrition. Missing source detail and secondary nutrient forms limit quality assessment.
Core nutrition amounts are visible, but a named matrix hides its components or shows no usable amount. Inactive ingredients and complete preparation directions are also missing.
The aggregate satisfaction signal is strong and the supplied volume is substantial. No specific experience details are supplied to assess repeated complaints, taste, texture, or purpose-related outcomes.
The core protein provides some value, but the serving is costly or poorly aligned with the stated use. Weak disclosure or an unbalanced formula further reduces competitiveness.
| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
Calories | 150 Calorie(s) |
Total Fat | 2.5 Gram(s) |
Cholesterol | 80 mg |
Total Carbohydrates | 3 Gram(s) |
Protein | 30 Gram(s) |
Calcium | 370 mg |
Iron | 0.6 mg |
Sodium | 150 mg |
Nitro-Amino Matrix | 0 NP |
Scientifically Studied Musclebuilder | 0 NP |
The label gives a useful calcium amount but does not disclose its chemical form. The serving amount is moderate, though it sits below the most efficient target band for a dedicated calcium supplement. A very high serving cost and the protein-focused formula make it weak value for calcium alone.