Product Image

Sugar Armor

NaturesPlus
4.5
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
(195 ratings)
Rhodiola
Chromium 60 mcg
Green Tea 100 mg
Product Image
Score62
Recognizable branded extracts offer some metabolic relevance, but modest doses, unclear potency, and poor value weaken the formula.
How scoring works
Quantity:60 Capsule(s) • (30 servings)
Goals:

Score 62

Recognizable branded extracts offer some metabolic relevance, but modest doses, unclear potency, and poor value weaken the formula.
How scoring works
$38.63($1.28 per serving)
iHerb
$ 38.63
Vitacost
$ 38.63
Report prices

Analysis

Chicory extract and a sea-vegetable blend make up most of the formula by weight. Chromium, green tea, and rhodiola add metabolism and stress-related pathways, but none is supplied with especially strong dose detail.

The rhodiola entry names several marker terms yet does not clearly state their percentages or total standardized yield. Green tea provides 100 mg without catechin, EGCG, or caffeine information, and chromium is modest at 60 mcg.

Branded ingredients and individually listed weights help basic transparency. The premium serving cost is difficult to defend when extract potency and practical outcomes remain uncertain.

Who is it for
  • Adults interested in a carbohydrate-focused botanical blend
  • Users who value branded extract sourcing
Best for
  • Chicory and sea-vegetable extract coverage
  • A compact capsule formula

Pros

  • Ingredient weights are disclosed
  • Uses recognizable branded materials
  • Includes chromium, green tea, and rhodiola
  • No large proprietary blend hides total weight

Cons

  • Green tea potency is not stated
  • Rhodiola standardization is unclear
  • Chromium amount is modest
  • Weak value per serving

Warnings

  • Sea-vegetable extracts may supply iodine, but the amount is not stated; this matters for thyroid conditions or thyroid-medicine dose adjustments.
  • Green tea extract may contain caffeine, yet the supplied label gives no caffeine amount for stimulant-sensitive users.

Nutrient quality

69 High impact

The metabolic ingredients are broadly coherent and several extracts are substantial. Low rhodiola depth and missing iodine, caffeine, and marker details limit confidence.

.

Ingredient transparency

68 High impact

Individual entries and weights are listed without a hidden blend. Repeated marker labeling, full potency details, directions, and inactive ingredients remain incomplete.

.

Customer satisfaction

63 Moderate impact

The average customer rating is generally favorable. The rating base is adequate but not especially deep, while specific review experiences were not supplied.

.

Value for money

44 Lower impact

Serving economics are weak. Formula weaknesses do not justify the asking price well.

.
Report analysis

Ingredients

IngredientAmount per serving
Chromate (Chromium)
60 mcg
InnuGuard (Cichorium intybus)
500 mg
InSea2 Sea Vegetables Extract (Ascophyllum nodosum Extract, Fucus vesiculosus Extract)
250 mg
Green Tea Leaf Extract (Camellia sinensis Leaf Extract)
100 mg
Rhodiola rosea Root Extract (Rosarin, Beta-Vicianosides, Rosin)
50 mg
Gluten Free Adults 18–50 Dairy Free Women
Report overview
B Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityC+ Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyF Value

The preferred Rhodiola rosea species is present as a concentrated root extract. Rosavin-family compounds are named, but percentages and salidroside standardization are not clearly disclosed. The low Rhodiola amount and high serving cost make it a weak choice for focused use.

Chromium · 60 mcg OverallScore14
F Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityF Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyD- Value

The named complex does not disclose an accepted chemical form of chromium. The 60 mcg serving is only a nutritional-level amount for this collection. A costly branded sea-vegetable extract adds metabolic value, but chromium itself remains expensive for the amount supplied.

F Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityF Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyF Value

The green tea extract lacks disclosed EGCG or polyphenol standardization, so its active strength cannot be verified. No absorption-enhancing delivery method is identified, and caffeine content is not stated. The missing EGCG amount also prevents a meaningful comparison of cost efficiency.

Loading alternative details
Report alternatives