Nutrient quality
The metabolic ingredients are broadly coherent and several extracts are substantial. Low rhodiola depth and missing iodine, caffeine, and marker details limit confidence.
.| $ 38.63 | ||
Vitacost | $ 38.63 |
Chicory extract and a sea-vegetable blend make up most of the formula by weight. Chromium, green tea, and rhodiola add metabolism and stress-related pathways, but none is supplied with especially strong dose detail.
The rhodiola entry names several marker terms yet does not clearly state their percentages or total standardized yield. Green tea provides 100 mg without catechin, EGCG, or caffeine information, and chromium is modest at 60 mcg.
Branded ingredients and individually listed weights help basic transparency. The premium serving cost is difficult to defend when extract potency and practical outcomes remain uncertain.
The metabolic ingredients are broadly coherent and several extracts are substantial. Low rhodiola depth and missing iodine, caffeine, and marker details limit confidence.
.Individual entries and weights are listed without a hidden blend. Repeated marker labeling, full potency details, directions, and inactive ingredients remain incomplete.
.The average customer rating is generally favorable. The rating base is adequate but not especially deep, while specific review experiences were not supplied.
.Serving economics are weak. Formula weaknesses do not justify the asking price well.
.| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
Chromate (Chromium) | 60 mcg |
InnuGuard (Cichorium intybus) | 500 mg |
InSea2 Sea Vegetables Extract (Ascophyllum nodosum Extract, Fucus vesiculosus Extract) | 250 mg |
Green Tea Leaf Extract (Camellia sinensis Leaf Extract) | 100 mg |
Rhodiola rosea Root Extract (Rosarin, Beta-Vicianosides, Rosin) | 50 mg |
The preferred Rhodiola rosea species is present as a concentrated root extract. Rosavin-family compounds are named, but percentages and salidroside standardization are not clearly disclosed. The low Rhodiola amount and high serving cost make it a weak choice for focused use.
The named complex does not disclose an accepted chemical form of chromium. The 60 mcg serving is only a nutritional-level amount for this collection. A costly branded sea-vegetable extract adds metabolic value, but chromium itself remains expensive for the amount supplied.
The green tea extract lacks disclosed EGCG or polyphenol standardization, so its active strength cannot be verified. No absorption-enhancing delivery method is identified, and caffeine content is not stated. The missing EGCG amount also prevents a meaningful comparison of cost efficiency.