Nutrient quality
Sunfiber is a recognized fiber form, while most botanicals and probiotics lack active-marker or viable-count detail. Guar fiber is meaningful, but many botanicals and probiotics are lightly dosed or difficult to interpret.
| $ 13.27 | ||
| $ 13.27 | ||
Vitacost | $ 13.27 |
The serving provides 1,660 mg of guar gum and 520 mg of alfalfa as its largest components. Fenugreek, rosemary, and several other herbs appear at only 80 mg each or less.
Two probiotic entries are listed by weight rather than colony-forming units. That prevents a meaningful assessment of viable probiotic potency.
The five-capsule serving and 37-serving supply are cumbersome for a modest fiber amount. Black walnut also makes the formula unsuitable for people with a relevant tree-nut allergy.
Sunfiber is a recognized fiber form, while most botanicals and probiotics lack active-marker or viable-count detail. Guar fiber is meaningful, but many botanicals and probiotics are lightly dosed or difficult to interpret.
Specific amounts are disclosed for every listed active ingredient. Non-active ingredients and excipients are not provided.
The supplied average rating is strong. The moderate rating sample provides reasonable statistical confidence.
A useful fiber core adds value, but lightly characterized secondary ingredients reduce formula quality. The moderate serving cost is reasonable for fiber support but less compelling for the crowded blend.
| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
Sunfiber (Guar Gum) | 1660 mg |
Alfalfa | 520 mg |
Pau d'Arco | 80 mg |
Echinacea angustifolia | 80 mg |
Black Walnut | 80 mg |
Fenugreek | 80 mg |
Parsley | 80 mg |
Rosemary | 80 mg |
Cayenne | 80 mg |
Triphala | 60 mg |
Watercress | 20 mg |
Lactobacillus acidophilus | 16 mg |
Lactospore Lactobacillus coagulans | 8.9 mg |
Pancreatin 4x USP powder | 20 mg |
The formula clearly provides 80 mg of rosemary, but it does not identify a plant part, extract ratio, or active marker. A capsule is a reasonable delivery form, yet the unstandardized rosemary offers uncertain diterpene potency. The serving cost is near the favorable end of the collection, although most of the formula is designed for digestive support rather than focused rosemary use.
The small amount of plain fenugreek is unlikely to match the collection's appetite or concentrated-extract goals. Clear amount disclosure is helpful, but the label gives no active-marker details or absorption support. The serving is inexpensive, yet the low fenugreek dose weakens its practical value for this collection.