Nutrient quality
A useful protein amount and naturally occurring minerals provide basic nutritional value. Weak heart-purpose alignment and unquantified components limit quality.
.| $ 79.00 | ||
| $ 79.00 |
The powder supplies a meaningful amount of goat-milk protein with moderate calcium and potassium. Low fat, modest carbohydrate, and a named Bacillus coagulans strain make the broad nutrition profile easy to understand.
Calcium and potassium forms are not identified, so absorption quality cannot be compared with targeted mineral products. Magnesium and phosphorus contribute little, while the probiotic amount is missing.
The formula works better as a flavored protein powder than as a heart-health or electrolyte supplement. Its high ongoing cost and limited mineral depth reduce value for users who do not specifically prefer goat milk.
A useful protein amount and naturally occurring minerals provide basic nutritional value. Weak heart-purpose alignment and unquantified components limit quality.
.Some core nutrition amounts are clear enough to evaluate. Missing complete ingredients, use directions, or blend details create meaningful gaps.
.Aggregate satisfaction data are favorable. Specific firsthand comments were not supplied, leaving repeated complaints and purpose fit uncertain.
.Formula weaknesses limit value for routine use. Better-balanced or more transparent alternatives are likely to be more practical.
.| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
Calories | 120 {Calories} |
Calories from Fat | 0 {Calories} |
Total Fat | 0 Gram(s) |
Cholesterol | 0 mg |
Sodium | 31 mg |
Total Carbohydrates | 11 Gram(s) |
Protein | 18 Gram(s) |
Potassium | 222 mg |
Magnesium | 8 mg |
Calcium | 288 mg |
Phosphorus | 32 mg |
Goat Milk Protein | 0 NP |
Goat Milk Mineral Whey | 0 NP |
Natural flavor | 0 NP |
Guar & Xanthan Gum Blend | 0 NP |
Goat Milk Cream | 0 NP |
Red Beet | 0 NP |
Stevia | 0 NP |
Bacillus coagulans GBI-30 6086 | 0 NP |
The calcium amount is in the general-supplementation range, but the source form is not identified. Elemental quantity is clear, while absorption potential remains uncertain. The high serving cost reflects a broader nutrition powder and offers poor efficiency for calcium-focused use.
The likely food-derived potassium source is not chemically identified, which limits confidence in form quality. Its 222 mg serving offers a moderate contribution but does not reach an effective-dose benchmark. Premium serving cost further weakens its fit as a dedicated potassium option.