Nutrient quality
The protein amount is meaningful and the macronutrient profile is practical. Incomplete whey-source detail and weak heart-specific coverage are the main limitations.
. Vitacost | $ 59.99 | |
| $ 68.46 |
The 27 g protein serving comes with only 0.5 g fat, 2 g carbohydrate, and no listed cholesterol. That lean profile can suit shoppers prioritizing protein density.
Potassium at 180 mg is too small to provide meaningful targeted electrolyte support. Sodium is also low for exercise hydration, and no ingredients specifically support lipids, vascular tone, or cardiac energy.
The nutrition panel is clearly quantified, but the supplied data do not identify the isolate source details, mineral forms, or other ingredients. Only 30 servings and a high serving cost reduce its value despite the lean composition.
The protein amount is meaningful and the macronutrient profile is practical. Incomplete whey-source detail and weak heart-specific coverage are the main limitations.
.Core nutrition totals are clear enough for basic comparison. Missing complete ingredients, use directions, and detailed protein or blend composition leave notable gaps.
.Aggregate satisfaction data are favorable. Specific firsthand comments were not supplied, leaving repeated complaints and purpose fit uncertain.
.The protein amount provides fair value for the category. Cost and formulation trade-offs keep it from standing out.
.| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
Calories | 120 Calorie(s) |
Total Fat | 0.5 Gram(s) |
Cholesterol | 0 mg |
Total Carbohydrates | 2 Gram(s) |
Protein | 27 Gram(s) |
Calcium | 103 mg |
Iron | 1.4 mg |
Sodium | 120 mg |
Potassium | 180 mg |
The sodium serving is too small for demanding sweat replacement. Potassium adds some electrolyte breadth, but its form and the sodium source are not identified. The protein-focused formula offers only middling value for a dedicated hydration goal.
The potassium amount offers only moderate support and remains well below the collection median. Its chemical form is undisclosed, making quality and metabolic utility unclear. A near-median serving cost is difficult to justify for potassium-focused use.
Published studies used for the product analysis and the top-ranked studies for each ingredient and goal.