Product Image

Whey To Go Chocolate Flavor

Solgar
4.7
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
(1033 ratings)
Sodium 130 mg
Potassium 220 mg
Protein 20 Gram(s)
Product Image
Score74
A smaller whey serving may fit lighter protein needs. Limited potassium, few servings, and missing ingredient details weaken its broader value.
How scoring works
Quantity:13 Ounce(s) • (13 servings)
Goals:

Score 74

A smaller whey serving may fit lighter protein needs. Limited potassium, few servings, and missing ingredient details weaken its broader value.
How scoring works

Also available as

2 options
Vanilla Flavor Protein (unspecified) 20 Gram(s), Carbohydrate (unspecified) 2 Gram(s) +1 more • 2 Pound(s) • 36 servings $39.00 ($1.08 per serving) Unflavored Potassium 210 mg, Protein 20 Gram(s) • 13 Ounce(s) • 13 servings $18.74 ($1.44 per serving)
$16.99($1.30 per serving)
iHerb
$ 16.99
Vitacost
$ 16.15
Pure Formulas
$ 41.24
Daily Vita
$ 17.99
Report prices

Analysis

The 20 g protein serving can suit people who prefer a smaller shake rather than a high-dose protein powder. Fat and carbohydrate remain modest, while the listed vitamin D amount contributes nothing.

Potassium at 220 mg adds a small electrolyte contribution but does not make the formula heart focused. Sodium is well below an exercise-replenishment dose, and no magnesium or dedicated cardiovascular ingredient is listed.

The basic nutrition panel is clear and easy to compare. Only 13 servings are included, and the supplied data omit the whey type, mineral forms, sweeteners, and flavoring ingredients.

Who is it for
  • Adults preferring a 20 g protein serving
  • People wanting a small container
  • Users focused on basic whey supplementation
Best for
  • Light daily protein support
  • Smaller post-workout shakes
  • Trying a whey powder without buying a large tub

Pros

  • Provides 20 g protein
  • Low fat per serving
  • Clearly lists sodium and potassium
  • Compact 13-serving format

Cons

  • Lower protein dose than many alternatives
  • Only 220 mg potassium
  • Vitamin D is listed at zero
  • Whey type and other ingredients are not disclosed

Warnings

  • Whey is milk-derived and is unsuitable for people with a milk allergy
  • Each serving contains 25 mg cholesterol, which may matter to people limiting dietary cholesterol
  • The 130 mg sodium amount is not sufficient for substantial sweat replacement

Nutrient quality

78 High impact

The protein amount is meaningful and the macronutrient profile is practical. Incomplete whey-source detail and weak heart-specific coverage are the main limitations.

.

Ingredient transparency

69 High impact

Core nutrition totals are clear enough for basic comparison. Missing complete ingredients, use directions, and detailed protein or blend composition leave notable gaps.

.

Customer satisfaction

69 High impact

Aggregate satisfaction data are favorable. Specific firsthand comments were not supplied, leaving repeated complaints and purpose fit uncertain.

.

Value for money

80 Highest impact

The protein amount provides fair value for the category. Cost and formulation trade-offs keep it from standing out.

.
Report analysis

Ingredients

IngredientAmount per serving
Calories
110 Calorie(s)
Total Fat
1.5 Gram(s)
Cholesterol
25 mg
Sodium
130 mg
Total Carbohydrates
5 Gram(s)
Protein
20 Gram(s)
Vitamin D
0 mcg
Calcium
40 mg
Iron
0.9 mg
Potassium
220 mg
Gluten Free Adults 18–50 Vegetarian
Report overview
Sodium · 130 mg OverallScore56
D- Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityC- Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyB+ Value

The sodium amount is too low for meaningful replacement during demanding exercise. Potassium is present, but its form and the sodium source are not identified. Value is reasonable for a protein powder, though the formula is poorly matched to an electrolyte-focused use.

View ingredientView products
Potassium · 220 mg OverallScore32
F Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityC Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyF Value

The listed potassium amount provides a moderate contribution but falls below the collection's typical target. The chemical form is not identified, so its absorption characteristics and metabolic role cannot be assessed. Cost efficiency is limited because the serving is priced above a budget level without delivering an effective potassium dose.

View ingredientView products
Loading alternative details
81 Performance

Whey Protein Isolate Chocolate

Kaged
<p>A lean whey isolate fits muscle recovery and general protein supplementation. The supplied quality and transparency profile is more favorable than Whey To Go Chocolate Flavor; a substantial isolate serving at a reasonable category cost supports good value.</p>
78 Performance

Classic ALLWHEY Vanilla

ALLMAX
<p>A high-protein whey powder fits general supplementation and exercise recovery. The supplied quality and transparency profile is more favorable than Whey To Go Chocolate Flavor; a substantial protein serving at a reasonable recurring cost supports good practical value.</p>
72 Performance

Whey Protein Isolate Dark Chocolate

California Gold Nutrition SPORT
<p>A 27-gram whey isolate serving provides concentrated protein with a manageable macronutrient load. The data do not show a decisive overall quality advantage over Whey To Go Chocolate Flavor, so this is mainly an alternative protein format; its main role is general protein intake rather than targeted heart support, and the supplied facts omit complete source and ingredient detail.</p>
78 Budget

GOLD ALLWHEY Chocolate

ALLMAX
<p>A 24-gram whey protein serving provides concentrated protein with a manageable macronutrient load. The lower recurring cost makes it more economical than Whey To Go Chocolate Flavor; its main role is general protein intake rather than targeted heart support, and the supplied facts omit complete source and ingredient detail.</p>
75 Budget

100% Whey Chocolate Malt

Optimum Nutrition
<p>A 24-gram whey protein serving provides concentrated protein with a manageable macronutrient load. The lower recurring cost makes it more economical than Whey To Go Chocolate Flavor; its main role is general protein intake rather than targeted heart support, and the supplied facts omit complete source and ingredient detail.</p>
81 Budget

Whey Protein Isolate Vanilla

Kaged
<p>A lean whey isolate fits muscle recovery and general protein supplementation. The lower recurring cost makes it more economical than Whey To Go Chocolate Flavor; a substantial isolate serving and reasonable category cost provide good practical value.</p>
73 Value

Select Plant Protein Vegan Series Indulgent Chocolate Bliss

PEScience
<p>A plant-based protein powder fits vegan protein supplementation. The supplied serving cost is not lower than Whey To Go Chocolate Flavor, so any value advantage depends on the stated format and ingredient strengths; a useful vegan protein amount offers fair value, though source details are incomplete; it changes the protein source and dietary fit.</p>
76 Value

Bone Broth Protein Chocolate

Ancient Nutrition
<p>Bone broth protein coherently supports people seeking a dairy-free animal protein format. The supplied serving cost is not lower than Whey To Go Chocolate Flavor, so any value advantage depends on the stated format and ingredient strengths; a useful protein serving supports quality, but the high routine cost limits value; it changes the protein source and dietary fit.</p>
64 Value

Nitro-Tech Milk Chocolate

MuscleTech
<p>A high-protein powder fits muscle growth and recovery. The supplied serving cost is not lower than Whey To Go Chocolate Flavor, so any value advantage depends on the stated format and ingredient strengths; a large protein serving supports value, but opaque matrices and incomplete source detail weaken quality.</p>
Report alternatives

Sources

Published studies used for the product analysis and the top-ranked studies for each ingredient and goal.

  1. Oral potassium supplementation for management of essential hypertension: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Poorolajal J; Zeraati F; Soltanian AR; Sheikh V; Hooshmand E; Maleki A · PloS one · 2017
    Meta-analysis1,213 participants23 studies pooledHeart Health forPotassium
  2. Potassium intake, stroke, and cardiovascular disease a meta-analysis of prospective studies.
    D'Elia L; Barba G; Cappuccio FP; Strazzullo P · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2011
    Meta-analysis247,510 participants11 studies pooledHeart Health forPotassium
  3. Effect of Potassium Supplementation on Endothelial Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intervention Studies.
    D'Elia L; Cappuccio FP; Masulli M; La Fata E; Rendina D; Galletti F · Nutrients · 2023
    Meta-analysis332 participants5 studies pooledHeart Health forPotassium
  4. Magnesium and Potassium Supplementation for Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction in the General Normotensive Population: A Systematic Review and Subgroup Meta-Analysis for Optimal Dosage and Treatment Length.
    Behers BJ; Behers BM; Stephenson-Moe CA; Vargas IA; Meng Z; Thompson AJ; Melchor J; Wojtas CN; Rosario MA; Baker JF; Deevers AC; Mouratidis RW; Sweeney MJ · Nutrients · 2024
    Meta-analysisHeart Health forPotassium
  5. Potassium intake and risk of stroke in women with hypertension and nonhypertension in the Women's Health Initiative.
    Seth A; Mossavar-Rahmani Y; Kamensky V; Silver B; Lakshminarayan K; Prentice R; Van Horn L; Wassertheil-Smoller S · Stroke · 2015
    Cohort study90,137 participantsHeart Health forPotassium
  6. Effect of high potassium diet on endothelial function.
    Blanch N; Clifton PM; Petersen KS; Willoughby SR; Keogh JB · Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD · 2015
    Randomized trial35 participantsHeart Health forPotassium
  7. Associations between sodium, potassium, and blood pressure: results from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos, a prospective cohort study.
    Swift SL; Sotres-Alvarez D; Raij L; Wassertheil-Smoller S; Schneiderman N; Llabre M; Zeki Al Hazzouri A; Rundek T; Van Horn L; Daviglus M; Castaneda S; Youngblood M; Mossavar-Rahmani Y; Elfassy T · The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2024
    Cohort study11,429 participantsHeart Health forPotassium
  8. Long-Term Potassium Monitoring and Dynamics in Heart Failure and Risk of Mortality.
    Núñez J; Bayés-Genís A; Zannad F; Rossignol P; Núñez E; Bodí V; Miñana G; Santas E; Chorro FJ; Mollar A; Carratalá A; Navarro J; Górriz JL; Lupón J; Husser O; Metra M; Sanchis J · Circulation · 2019
    Cohort study2,164 participantsHeart Health forPotassium
  9. Serum potassium levels provide prognostic information in symptomatic heart failure beyond traditional clinical variables.
    Toledo CC; Vellosa Schwartzmann P; Miguel Silva L; da Silva Ferreira G; Bianchini Cardoso F; Citelli Ribeiro V; Paim LR; Antunes-Correa LM; Carvalho Sposito A; Matos Souza JR; Modolo R; Nadruz W; Fernandes de Carvalho LS; Coelho-Filho OR · ESC heart failure · 2021
    Cohort study178 participantsHeart Health forPotassium
  10. Finerenone, Serum Potassium, and Clinical Outcomes in Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction.
    Vardeny O; Vaduganathan M; Claggett BL; Desai AS; Jhund PS; Lam CSP; Senni M; Shah SJ; Voors AA; Zannad F; Pitt B; Matsumoto S; Merkely B; Zieroth S; Yilmaz MB; Lay-Flurrie J; Viswanathan P; Horvat-Broecker A; Scalise A; McMurray JJV; Solomon SD · JAMA cardiology · 2025
    Randomized trial6,001 participantsHeart Health forPotassium