Nutrient quality
Protein source details or amino-acid quality are too incomplete to confirm form quality. The protein amount is meaningful for a typical meal or post-exercise serving.
. Amazon | $ 26.97 | |
| $ 44.97 | ||
Vitacost | $ 49.47 |
The larger serving lists 24 g protein, 9 mg iron, and modest fat. It can contribute meaningfully to daily protein intake without a large carbohydrate load.
A second nutrition panel lists 16 g protein and lower values, leaving serving interpretation unclear. Sodium reaches 442 mg in the larger panel, while the supplied details do not show protein-source proportions or flavor ingredients.
The mocha format may suit a morning or workout shake, but no caffeine amount is provided. Protein support is clear; direct mental-focus and heart-health benefits are not.
Protein source details or amino-acid quality are too incomplete to confirm form quality. The protein amount is meaningful for a typical meal or post-exercise serving.
.Protein and nutrient totals are shown, but source-level active amounts are incomplete. Serving count is available, but complete scoop and preparation guidance are not supplied.
.The supplied average rating is mixed for the category. No specific feedback was supplied to judge recurring complaints or fit with the intended use.
.The protein amount partly supports the asking price, with disclosure or goal-fit limitations. Serving cost is reasonable but not especially compelling for the disclosed quality.
.| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
Calories | 130 Calorie(s) |
Total Fat | 3 Gram(s) |
Total Carbohydrates | 7 Gram(s) |
Protein | 24 Gram(s) |
Calcium | 49 mg |
Iron | 9 mg |
Sodium | 442 mg |
Potassium | 167 mg |
The sodium amount is near the lower edge of useful athletic replenishment, and its source form is not disclosed. Potassium adds supporting electrolyte coverage, though its chemical form is unclear. The carbohydrate load is moderate, and the serving value is reasonable for the category.
Iron is a minor nutrient contribution rather than an effective standalone dose. The chemical form is not disclosed, and no qualifying absorption cofactors are present. The convenient scoop does not offset poor iron-focused value.
Potassium reaches a moderate amount only at the larger serving, while the chemical source is not disclosed. Two listed amounts reflect the variable scoop size but make the exact intake serving-dependent. The protein blend rather than potassium drives most of the serving cost.